July 20, 2006
Every month, in collaboration with the Institute of
Workplace Studies (IWS), CAHRS identifies the ‘Top
10’ news items from the IWS News Service covering
key workplace issues that would be of interest to
CAHRS sponsors. Now CAHRS and the HR
Division have agreed to distribute this information as
another benefit of HR Division membership.
These news items are carefully selected, covering
areas such as emerging workplace trends,
compensation, executive training and development,
technology enabled HR services, important policy
announcements impacting people practices,
employment related macro economic data and top
line general economic data, significant court
decisions relating to employment law and any other
issue of potential significance to human resource
managers.
The content is sourced from U.S. Government and
international agencies, public and private bodies,
consultancies and knowledge services firms, industry
associations, unions and select academic institutions.
Because the links below are sometimes to
copyrighted materials, you may be asked to sign in to
a proprietary website (for example Business Week
online) after following the link. However, once you
have signed up for these free services, you will be
able to find the complete article. Our goal is
to
provide you with information about up-to-date issues
in HR.
The CAHRS Top Ten

1.
Why offer employee benefits? [June 2006], by
McKinsey
Summary: The vast majority of US
executives see employee benefits as important to
their company's competitiveness, according to the
latest McKinsey Quarterly survey. Fully 88 percent of
the respondents name human-resources concerns—
particularly attracting and retaining talent plus
meeting responsibilities to employees—as the main
reasons for offering benefits. Despite this motivation,
many companies haven't learned what their
employees really want from benefit programs, and
few actually measure the performance of (or return
on investment from) their benefit offering
2. Is Your Team Too Big? Too Small? What's
the Right Number? [June 2006], by Knowledge at
Wharton
Summary: When it comes to athletics,
sports teams have a specific number of team
players: A basketball team needs five, baseball nine,
and soccer 11. But when it comes to the workplace,
there is no hard-and-fast rule to determine the
optimal number to have on each team. Should the
most productive team have 4.6 members, as
suggested in a recent magazine article? What about
naming five or six individuals to each team, which is
the number of MBA students chosen each year by
Wharton for its learning teams? Is it true that larger
teams simply break down, reflecting a tendency
towards "social loafing" and loss of coordination? Or
is it that the best number of people for a team is
driven by the task at hand and by the roles each
person plays? Research by Wharton faculty offers
some insights.
3. Telework
Bench Marking Study: Best Practices for Large Scale
Implementation in Public and Private Sector
Organizations, [June 2006], by the Telework
Coalition
Summary: The objective of this study is to
identify the best practices of public and private
sector organizations with large-scale telework
programs to better understand how their programs
were created and how they have grown. The criteria
used to evaluate best practices include program
development and administration, implementation,
technology and equipment, and program evaluation.
Organizations were identified based on their
reputation for having large, well-established telework
programs. Thirteen organizations participated,
including three public-sector organization and ten
private-sector companies. The industries represented
include finance, government, health care, science,
technology, and telecommunications.
4. Rew
ards Transformation: Turning Rewards from a Cost
into an Investment, [June 2006], by Deloitte
Summary: This whitepaper suggests a more
extensive “Rewards Dialogue” between
employers and employees, a kind of continuous
feedback loop in which an employer would regularly
reach out to all its employees for their views about
their total rewards and responding to them to
demonstrate that it is listening in a meaningful way.
This outreach would take place on a continual basis
and should enable the employer to spot trends in
employees’ responses. It also discusses how
companies can determine Reward ROI by viewing one
critical driver of total rewards as an employer-
employee “total rewards marketplace” – one in which
employees “trade” their time and talent for the total
rewards the employer offers, while employers designs
total rewards “products” that can help elicit the
desired results from their employee “rewards
consumer.” By understanding the dynamics of its own
total rewards marketplace, an employer can better
assess the impact of total rewards on business value
and focus its rewards investment on those programs
that have a higher likelihood of driving the desired
return.
5. Connecting the Corporate Dots: Social
Networks Reveal How Employees and Companies
Operate, [June 2006], by Knowledge at Wharton
Summary: With the recent disclosure of
wiretapping by the National Security Agency and the
booming success of sites like MySpace and
Friendster, social networking is much in the news
today. But serious interest in social networks can
also be found among academics, consultants and
corporations seeking to deepen their knowledge of
how companies operate. While organizations have
been aware of the power of social networks for some
time now, researchers at Wharton note that mapping
these connections can yield some potent insights,
such as how board members interact within and
among companies, and how employee relationships
can be better understood to improve productivity
and the dissemination of ideas.
6. Offshoring undermines job security but
not motivation, [June 2006], by Watson Wyatt
UK
Summary: One in five UK employees feels
insecure in their job because of the risk it will
be 'offshored' to a low-cost country such as India or
China, while two in five say that they feel less
secure in their jobs than they did three years ago,
according to new research from consultants Watson
Wyatt. However the research found that while there
was a clear negative correlation between offshoring
and job security, the negative impact of offshoring
on employee motivation and stress and was
considerably less strong. People appear not to be
looking to switch jobs because of it.
7. How to reconnect young people
and organizations, [June 2006], by Demos
Summary: There is a damaging disconnect
between young people and organisations. A
disconnect between the training of today and the
workplaces of tomorrow, and between the changing
values of young people and the organisational
cultures that they encounter. This has emerged
because of a series of rapid shifts in both the supply
of jobs available from employers and the demand for
jobs, or expectations of employment, on the part of
graduates. On the supply-side, the jobs available in
the economy are changing, as is the nature of many
organisations themselves. On the demand-side, the
expectations and values of young people are shifting,
alongside the changing nature of the graduate career
itself. And changing values and social norms provide
new questions for employers, as they struggle to find
ways to attract, motivate and support a generation
of young people with higher debt, different values,
and more demanding jobs than ever before.
8. Pathways to Success: Human Resource
Practices Do Matter, [June 2006], by ILR Impact
Briefs
Summary: Human resource practices that
foster strong connections between employees and
employer generally sustain a social climate within the
organization that facilitates the exchange and
combination of knowledge necessary for innovation
and growth. More specifically, certain selection,
training and development, and compensation
strategies comprise the high-commitment human
resource practices that help create an environment
of trust, cooperation, and shared language. It is this
social climate that motivates and enables employees
to communicate the ideas and information that
spawn new knowledge, which in turn leads to new
products and higher sales.
9. The Global Test, [June 16,
2006], by Ed Silverman, Human Resource Executive
(June 16, 2006)
Summary: Increasing numbers of expatriate
work assignments along with a decrease in the length
of those assignments are forcing global companies to
re-examine selection methods for expatriate workers.
With the hope of finding employees that can get up
to speed in a new culture and become productive
quickly and consistently, companies must take
factors such as awareness of cultural subtleties,
family constraints, and personality into account while
limiting the influence of company politics and the
tendency of managers to make “gut decisions” when
selecting personnel for work overseas. According to
the author, the primary, and most effective way to
achieve this feat, is testing accompanied by the
presence of HR professionals familiar with expatriate
work.
10. HR Factors Affecting Repatriate Job Satisfaction
and Job Attachment for Japanese Managers, [May
2006], Michael J. Stevens, Gary Oddou, Norihito
Furuya, Alan Bird, and Mark Mendenhall, International
Journal of Human Resource Management
Summary: The authors, working from the
basis of demonstrated higher attrition rates for
repatriated workers returning from overseas
assignments, examine the relation between repatriate
job satisfaction and job attachment, HR support
practices, and self-adjustment tendencies. They find
a strong link between the propensity of employees to
self-adjust and positive measures of job satisfaction
and attachment. A lesser, but still very significant,
correlation between supportive HR practices and
positive measures of job satisfaction and attachment
was also demonstrated. The authors conclude that
general and strategic HR policies, as they relate to
repatriated employees, must be carefully managed in
order to ensure the optimal benefit for the
organization.
Learn more...